← Back to work
03 · Solo Project, ME 557

DFM/DFA: Injection‑Molded Cube

A ground-up manufacturability teardown of a 3x3 mechanical puzzle cube — solo-authored, using formal Design for Manufacturing and Assembly methodology to price out how it would actually be built at volume.

Role
Solo — full analysis, sole author
Timeframe
April 2025
Method
Boothroyd–Dewhurst DFA, injection-molding process economics
Output
Per-part cost model, cycle time, mold/tonnage selection

The problem

Anyone can say a part "should be injection molded." Fewer people can price out what that actually costs at a given volume, defend a tonnage and mold-cavitation choice, and show where the manufacturing cost is actually coming from. This project was an exercise in doing that rigorously, alone, for a deceptively complex assembly — a 3x3 puzzle cube has more interacting plastic geometry than it looks like from the outside.

Approach

I ran a full Boothroyd-Dewhurst Design-for-Assembly analysis on the cube's internal mechanism to quantify assembly time and part-count efficiency, then moved into manufacturing process economics: modeling injection-molding cycle time from cooling and packing equations, selecting an appropriate clamping tonnage and mold configuration for the part geometry and production volume, and building a per-part cost model that separates material, machine-time, and tooling-amortization cost.

Referenced hardware Analysis referenced real molded part geometry — draft angles, wall thickness, and gate placement pulled from a comparative teardown of similarly molded plastic components.

Why this is on the site

Most of my other work is team-based; this one is entirely mine, start to finish, and it's the most quantitatively "manufacturing" piece in the portfolio — directly relevant to any role where a design decision has to be justified in dollars per unit at production volume, not just in CAD.

← Basketball Shot Biomechanics Height-Adjustable Wheelchair →